View Here : 2013 Honda Crv Review
Which Is Better: 2013 Honda CR-V or 2013 Toyota RAV4? The RAV4 is a popular alternative to the CR-V, but the Honda is the better choice overall. It has slightly more horsepower, better safety scores, and a nicer interior.
Review. I bought my first CR-V earlier this year - a 2013 with 62k miles on it. It sucks! I've had the SUV for 6 months and have just put 5k miles on it.
Our Take on the 2013 Honda CR-V Editor's note: This review was written in November 2011 about the 2012 Honda CR-V. Little of substance has changed with this year's model.
Paul P., NM (2013 Honda CR-V Unsure 2.4-L 4 Cyl) “there was a problem with the computer program that controlled charging of the battery. Caused 2 batteries to go bad in 4 years.
Read the full in-depth review of the Used 2013 CR-V at Edmunds. Edmunds' expert review of the Used 2013 Honda CR-V provides the latest look at trim-level features and specs, performance, safety ...
Honda's CR-V was redesigned for 2012. At that time the five-seat compact crossover got new styling inside and out. Offered with either front- or all-wheel drive, all CR-Vs are powered by a 2.4 ...
The 2013 Honda CR-V is a competitive performer in the segment. Credit for that goes to a standard 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 185 horsepower and 163 pound-feet of torque. That output is managed by a standard five-speed automatic transmission.
The 2013 Honda CR-V was named a Top Safety Pick by the IIHS, and received a five-star overall rating from NHTSA. New for 2013 Since the CR-V was new for 2012, the 2013 Honda CR-V carries over with ...
The 2013 Honda CR-V hits all the right marks for cost-conscious families—with its interior layout and safety ratings both best-in-class—although it doesn't feel as sprightly as former CR-V models.
The sole powertrain combination in all 2013 Honda CR-V models is the familiar 2.4-liter i-VTEC 4-cylinder engine matched with the equally-familiar 5-speed automatic transmission.